Interview with Victor Grossman on Bernie Sanders and Democratic Socialism

Interview with Victor Grossman (VG) by Michael Steltzer (MS)
On Bernie Sanders and Democratic Socialism
Jan. 28th, 2016 in Berlin, Germany


MS: Victor, we are sitting here in this nice café at Straussberger Platz and I am really happy that you are going to give me an interview. Why don’t we just speak a little bit about why you are here in this part of the city. How did you get here?

VG: I was just a little bit too young to get drafted during the Second World War, but not to young to be drafted during the Korean War and I made the terrible mistake of concealing my nasty left wing past when I got drafted. I denied it because in those days, it was a very, very serious situation, it was a very frightening situation. Based on fear, I concealed my past, hoping that I would last the two years without their checking on me. I was lucky I wasn’t sent to Korea, I was sent to Bavaria. But I wasn’t so lucky because they did check on me. And since I knew there was a possible $10,000 fine and five years in prison for having concealed my past, I panicked and fled to Austria, which in those days was divided. I swam across the Danube River to the Soviet zone of Austria and they brought me to East Germany, where I have been living ever since.[1]

MS: So you were actually one of the few that fled from West to East?

VG: That’s right. In fact, my constant gag is I’m the only person in the world who has a diploma from Harvard University and from Karl Marx University and since it no longer has that name. I will probably retain that distinction.

MS: Well, you certainly are a unique person. One of the things that you have done here, I know you were a journalist and you had the opportunity to escort and interpret for many official guests (from the US) who came to the GDR. Maybe you could name a few. I just remember you were the person who accompanied Angela Davis when she was here. Is that true?

VG: No, no, it’s not. I accompanied no official visitors. I was the interpreter for Pete Seeger and his wife when they were here. And I was briefly the interpreter for Joan Baez during her press conference and Earl Robinson, The great left wing composer. I interpreted for him too. He is the composer who wrote the quite well known song about Joe Hill. Angela Davis I met, but I never accompanied her on her visits here. And I don’t recall any other famous…, oh yes, I also interpreted for Jane Fonda when she brought her film about Vietnam to the International Documentary Film Week in Leipzig. I interpreted for her then in her meetings with various people and so got to know her just a little bit.

MS: Well, that is pretty exciting. She was known as “Hanoi Jane” because of that infamous picture that was taken of her in front of an antiaircraft gun in Hanoi, North Vietnam.

VG: Of course, many would argue about the term “infamous”, but, in any case, famous picture.

MS: Very famous, some would say “infamous”, but she became famous for sure.

VG: That’s right. She made a film while she was in Vietnam and she brought this as a documentary film to Leipzig and that was when I got a chance to meet her and do a little bit of interpreting for her.

MS: You have been living here in Berlin since 1950?

VG: In Berlin since 1958. In East Germany since 1952.

MS: One of the reasons I am asking you some of these questions is that you are really quite active regarding the development of politics in Europe and in Germany. You write very regularly and many of us read your bulletins, but you very seldom write about developments within the United States and so I am here to ask you some questions specifically about the presidential campaign that is going on now, and again specifically about Bernie Sanders. How would you explain the phenomenum of Trump and Sanders in the United States today? Both of these candidates and their respective parties are…

VG: … mavericks.

MS: Yes, they are mavericks, but they are way “up front”.

VG: Evidently, or, it seems that a very large number of Americans are so worried about the way things are going for them in their own personal lives. The fact that they have not moved ahead for the last few years in terms of income, that if they are students who are buried in debt for years, if they have medical problems they, despite some advances, still have very serious problems. Or with the mortgages, or with just getting jobs and getting a decent job, a regular job, that they no longer trust the men and women in Washington to represent them. They don’t believe the words they say, they consider them to be clichés. And they look and they search for somebody who is different, who seems to offer a very different path. And some of them, especially those who tend to blame their woes on either immigrants, especially from Mexico and Central America or the “traditional” danger of black Americans, who they blame or are induced to blame for their own worries. And those are the kind of people who might turn to Trump. Others have not looked for these scapegoats, but are still unhappy and looking for answers and have found the answers in the group which became famous during the Occupy movement, the 99% against the 1%. Those are people who say that if that 1% up on top, who have taken everything for themselves, and including all propaganda outlets – which they just do not believe anymore. They are looking for new answers and they are the ones who tend to vote for Sanders.

MS: We were talking a little bit earlier and you said you are a supporter of Bernie Sanders. How do you go about supporting him? What do you think you can do? What are the steps that you take living here in Berlin to do what you can? What do you do?

VG: There is not so much that I can do here in Berlin for Bernie. I do send these bulletins mostly to Americans who are interested in Germany. I write mostly about German developments. At the same time there are so many cross currents that involve Germany and the United States. I make no secret of the fact that I also support Bernie Sanders. At the same time here in Berlin I write articles too about the United States and in these articles I have been trying and will continue trying to explain to people who know almost nothing about Sanders. There has been relatively little in the press here, although in the last month or two there has been more. But many people know almost nothing about Sanders and some of them simply assume that Hillary is going to win, and I to try and explain that. And of course I am going to vote too. I will be voting in November.

MS: Great! When you look at Bernie Sanders he calls himself a Democratic Socialist. You lived in a socialist country for many years and I am sure you have been dealing with the system and the ideology and all of this. How much of that do you think is relevant to that what Bernie Sanders is saying Democratic Socialism is? What sort of an impact is that going to have on that election in the fall of this year?

VG: Well, of course the kind of socialism which was preached and organized here in East Germany, or in the East in general, and that which Bernie Sanders is speaking for are quite different in many ways, but have some similarities too. The main similarity is a regard for the welfare of that 99%, especially for the ones who make the least money, who have the toughest time. In other words, Sanders, as I have said, is out to make sure that people can get educated even if they don’t have a lot of money or without going into debt, can get health care without having to go into deep debt or having to go without medicine or having to choose either medicine or food, that people need not fear being thrown out of their homes, that they don’t fear a long unemployment or fear having barely enough to live on. I think that that ties up Bernie Sanders and socialism without going into theoretical questions of Karl Marx or other things. I think that Bernie Sanders is interested in making sure that as many people as possible get a fair deal and that he realizes that we must oppose the attempts of the extremely wealthy at the top, who want only more and more tax rebates and less and less taxes and less and less for the people at or near the bottom or the middle, but without going into the basic question, which was raised here in East Germany, taking over all the means of production and the banks and the major factories. I don’t think Bernie has spoken for that and I have no idea what he thinks, but it certainly is not part of his program now.

MS: In the development of things, you do not share the optimism that I do. As a staunch Bernie fan, I see a lot moving for him. With the Iowa caucuses coming up in a few days, personally I think it is going to be a landslide. Nonetheless, he might lose and he might not win the nomination, so his competitor would be Hillary Clinton, whom I would call a corporate Democrat or a neo-liberal Democrat, or whatever you want to call her. She would probably run against Cruz or Trump as it looks now. What would you do in that case?

VG: That is a difficult question. First of all, I hope very much that Bernie Sanders wins in Iowa. I am not quite so certain that it will be a landslide. I just hope that he wins even by a small edge. I think that he will win in New Hampshire. I think it is going to be a very, very tight race, at least at the beginning. I think that he has many odds against him. Still, I am not completely pessimistic, but I’m just hopeful. If he does not win the nomination, and, of course even if he does get nominated and loses the election, I would hope that large, large sectors of people who support Bernie Sanders and who actively support him with small amounts of money, with running around trying to organize people to go to the caucuses or to vote for him, I hope that this general movement of people will remain active. In fac,t I hope that it doesn’t die out. In fact, I hope that, even if he does become president. However I am not, I am still… I am not so optimistic because I think that the forces who fear that Sanders would increase their taxes to help the people at the bottom will do everything they possibly can to prevent him from winning. I still have hopes, but I try to be realistic. I hope that whatever happens, people will keep active and keep at it… I was very enthusiastic about the Occupy movement. I thought it was wonderful that people had so much courage and raised this question about the 1%. But then, it died out. It was beaten back in many ways. I would hope that this does not happen in the Sanders campaign, that it stays alive, grows and helps to restrengthen the union movement and the movement of black people and the movement of immigrants and women, gays, students and all the other groups. That they neither give up and say “that’s it”, or if he loses they give up too. I hope that doesn’t happen. Keep at it. There is plenty to be done.

MS: You were saying that Bernie Sanders has so many odds against him. And you mentioned a few, for example, that some of his arguments are going to be misused, like the raising of taxes. What other odds do you see out there that disturb you?

VG: Well, it doesn’t disturb me, but it will disturb a lot of people, that name “socialist”. A lot of people in the United States have all kinds of crazy ideas of what socialism means. Many of them attack Obama alternately as “Socialist”, “Communist” and “Fascist”, which means that they didn’t know what any of them meant. They just know there was something bad. I think an awful lot of Americans they just hear a word like “Socialist” and they are immediately frightened and they think that somebody is not only going to take away their gun, but also their house or their wife or their property. And they are really frightened. I think the more success Bernie has, the more attacks there will be against him as a wild socialist, communist, radical danger. And that is what undoubtedly will be used against him. I hope that people are smart enough to see that words like these have been used for at least a century and a half to frighten people away from voting for their own good. They use this against every attempt to move forward in history. They sometimes use different words for it. They always have somebody who is frightening for them and you have to fight back. I hope that it does not work this time, that people see through that despite all the frightful media campaigns.

MS: So it is basically using the term “socialism” as fear mongering?

VG: Absolutely! I am sure that it has already been used. But the more he wins out, the more it will become almost perhaps hysterical.

MS: Yes, that reminds me of that article by Glen Greenwald we were talking about, where he is speaking about the 7 levels of backlash that are happening now. Greenwald says Bernie is at the 5th level and that the 7th might be coming soon.[2]

Thank you for some of your thoughts. Is there anything else you would like to include in this interview?

VG: I hope that Americans do not fall for the kind of propaganda from a Trump or Cruz, who try to blame the problems that they face either on African Americans, or on Mexicans or immigrants. The same thing is going on now in Europe against this wave of immigrants that is being used by very frightening groups to try to get people to move against their best interests, to try to split people, to set one group against the other. And actually, people should be working together to achieve a better life for the majority. Everything is being done to split people apart and now Europe’s big immigrant wave, which, as in the United States, is all too similar and all too frightening because some people are willing to use any methods to frighten people and set them against the others, making them hate and fear.

MS: Unfortunately I do not see a European or German Sanders campaign to pick up some of that.

VG: There are one or two possibilities. One, of course, is in England with Corbyn, who is trying to do the same thing. And then, too, in Spain and Portugal there have been moves in this direction. There was a move in this direction in Greece too, which has been pretty well smashed, but is not dead.

MS: You are talking about Syriza and Podemos?

VG: Well, Syriza proved disappointing in the end. They were crushed or beaten somehow. Nevertheless, an awful lot of Greek people still have that spirit of fighting back. And the same in Spain and the same in Portugal. They fight back in different ways, but they do want to fight back. And yesterday in Francethere was a big strike movement against unjust measures against people in the transportation system, teachers. This is the kind of thing which shows that some people are ready and willing to fight back. The other side is very strong and is trying to split them up. They hate each other. But it is a long hard fight and I can only say I hope the best side wins.

MS: Well, in France there certainly are, on the one hand the strikes and, on the other hand, within the government you see that this one minister, the last progressive bastion in the government, has resigned or was forced to resign. So now you have a neo-liberal government.

VG: There is a hope that this minister will take part in such a movement too.

MS: Listening to your last comments, it seems to be a phenomenum which is in Europe as well as in the United States.

VG: Yes, both the negatives and, to a degree, the positives, if you look hard.

MS: Thank you, Victor, for this interview.

Michael Steltzer

[1] Victor Grossman (Stephen Wechsler), Crossing the River – A Memoir of the American Left, the Cold War, and Life in East Germany, University of Massachusetts Press, 2013.

[2] Glenn Greenwald, The Seven Stages of Establishment Backlash: Corbyn/Sanders Edition; The Intercept. Jan 21, 2016.

© Copyright 2016 – Michael Steltzer


Tom Hayden on Bernie and Hillary

In his latest newsletter Tom Hayden deals with the split of the Democratic Party and its main presidential candidates Hillary and Bernie.  Although I throroughly respect Toms views on the impact of the Bernie campaign on the future of the politics in our country and the influence it will have on the development of the Democratic Party, I was taken aback by his practical non-commitment to Bernies campaign.  So I started writung down short texts on the essence of his message.  I was shocked at what I wrote about the “Participatory Democrat” Tom Hayden.  I share my notes with you as an introduction.  Perhaps I am wrong and not at the basic message of Tom.  But you can help with that if you like … but, as you see, I am worried.

Continue reading

Berlin4Bernie – Flyer for Berlin: “Are you Prepared”

Please click on the link for a display of the flyer for Americans in Berlin why and how to support the Democratic nomination of Bernie Sanders … feel the Bern!  Feel free to print it out @Berlin4Bernie

Flyer Are you prepared

Thank you to London4Bernie for your support

The Syrian Kurds Are Winning! by Jonathan Steele

The Syrian Kurds Are Winning!

From New York Review of Books
December 3, 2015 Issue
Newsha Tavakolian/Magnum Photos

Kurdish fighters in the Women’s Protection Unit during their daily drills at Shilan Camp, in the border region of Andivar, Rojava, Syria, summer 2015

Anyone searching for a sliver of light in the darkness of the Syrian catastrophe has no better place to go than the country’s northeast. There some 2.2 million Kurds have created a quasi state that is astonishingly safe—and strangely unknown abroad. No barrel bombs are dropped by Bashar al-Assad’s warplanes. No ISIS executioners enforce the wearing of the niqab. No Turkish air strikes send civilians running, as Turkish attacks on Kurdish militia bases do across the border in Iraq.

Safety is of course a relative concept. Car bombs and suicide attacks by ISIS assassins regularly take lives in this predominantly Kurdish 250-mile-wide stretch of Syria between the Tigris and Euphrates rivers, but by the standards of the rest of the country it is quiet.

The 2.2 million Kurds make up a tenth of the Syrian population. During the protests of 2011—the Arab Spring—they, like their Arab counterparts in other Syrian cities, publicly demonstrated for reform in Qamishli, the region’s largest city. But Assad was milder toward them than he was to other protesters elsewhere. He gave citizenship to 300,000 stateless Kurds and in July 2012 even withdrew most of his combat troops from the area on the grounds that they were needed more urgently in the Syrian heartland of Aleppo, Damascus, and the cities in between.

Kurdish militias known as the People’s Protection Units (YPG) quickly organized the support of much of the Kurdish adult population under thirty and took control of the region, which they divide into three “cantons” and which they call Rojava (i.e., West, meaning western Kurdistan, from roj, the Kurdish word for sun). The other Kurdish regions are in Turkey, Iran, and Iraq.

Over the next three years the YPG trained and built a well-disciplined, though lightly armed, military force and set up an efficient system of local government. It is a measure of the Assads’ repression that, whereas in Turkey bans on the Kurdish language were lifted in 1991, they were kept in place for another two decades in Syria. As a result most adults in Rojava speak better Arabic than Kurdish. Now in charge of their own statelet, Kurdish leaders are reviving the use of the Kurdish language in schools and on TV and radio stations.

The language, Kurmanji, belongs to the Indo-European family and is akin to Farsi but distinct from Arabic or Turkish. Unlike Arabs and Turks but like Iranians, Kurds celebrate the New Year, Newroz, on the first day of spring.

The Kurds are originally a mountain people, who emerged near Lake Van in eastern Turkey. Their most famous warrior, Saladin, who captured Jerusalem from the Crusaders, was active with his regiments along the Mediterranean in the twelfth century. Many settled in Damascus and Aleppo.

Under the Ottoman Empire Kurdish identity was not threatened, and it was natural that when the empire collapsed at the end of World War I Kurds hoped to create an independent state. In the Treaty of Sèvres in 1920 they were promised a state by the British and other Western powers but Kemal Atatürk, the Turkish leader, refused to implement the treaty and the Western powers changed their line. Kurds were marginalized in Turkey. After several failed rebellions in the 1920s thousands fled to Syria. There, under the French mandate, Kurds were privileged over the Arab majority, particularly in getting jobs in the army and police.

After Syria won its independence in 1946 the public projection of a separate Kurdish culture was repressed by the new Arab rulers, even though other minorities—Armenian, Assyrian, and Druze—were recognized. Syrian Kurds were Arabized and influenced by the modernizing ideology of urban Syria. Today they show few signs of their mountain origins or tribal affiliations. Whereas older men in Iraqi Kurdistan often wear sirwal—baggy trousers held up by a cummerbund—the costume is rarely seen in Rojava.

But the dream of having a state of their own has never faded. With around 32 million people worldwide, they are the largest ethnic group without one. Retaining this aspiration is the key factor that has kept Kurds tough and self-reliant through decades of repression in the four countries where they are numerous. After Iraq, where Kurds have enjoyed autonomy in the north since 1991, and Turkey, where the militant PKK has been fighting for Kurdish autonomy since 1984, the Kurds of Syria saw their first real opportunity for change as late as 2011. At all levels of Syrian Kurdish society there is now a strong desire to reverse the last half-century of assimilationist pressures and revive their cultural heritage, particularly the Kurdish language and literature and the celebration of Newroz with Kurdish music and dancing. Syrian Kurds put greater store on national identity than organized religion. Most Kurdish clerics are Sufis of the Sunni branch of Islam and, in contrast to the Syrian Arab opposition to Assad, none of the dozen Kurdish political parties in Syria is Islamist.

In spite of the huge attention given to Syria’s war by international media, no foreign diplomats or businesspeople and only a handful of reporters have made the trip to Rojava. The first, albeit brief, coverage came in September of last year, from across the Turkish border. That was after ISIS fighters swept north from Raqqa, the headquarters of their newly declared caliphate, and launched a surprise attack on the Kurdish canton of Kobanî. They captured dozens of Kurdish villages, executed scores of people who didn’t have time to escape, and moved toward the large town of Kobanî, which sits on Syria’s border with Turkey.

The Kurdish YPG forces resisted as best they could with the help of seasoned guerrillas from the PKK. After desperate pleas for help from the YPG as well as from Washington’s allies in the Kurdish Regional Government in northern Iraq, the US started bombing ISIS positions on the approaches to Kobanî. Several dozen Kurdish fighters from Iraq—called peshmerga—also joined the fighting. In spite of the US air strikes the ISIS advance continued and by October its militants were inside the town of Kobanî as they poured reinforcements from Raqqa into the battle.

This was the first sustained engagement between US airpower and ISIS, and reporters from across the world who were camped just inside Turkey filmed ISIS artillery strikes and the much larger plumes of smoke caused by US bombs and missiles. With most of Kobanî’s civilian population fleeing into Turkey, cameras also broadcast the first pictures of vast streams of Kurdish Syrian refugees escaping northward, a harbinger of the broader flight of refugees was to come a year later. Meanwhile, Turkish tanks and armored personnel carriers patrolled the Kobanî border within a few hundred yards of the battle and did nothing to help.

Gradually, the Kurdish fighters prevailed and in January of this year ISIS withdrew, though it took another three months to drive them out of the villages south of Kobanî. As many as a thousand ISIS fighters were thought to have died. The YPG had shown it was the most successful group of fighters with whom the US could ally in Syria and open cooperation now exists. There was a second crucial lesson: using airpower makes little sense without an infantry force, preferably of local people, to follow up on the bombing.

In July of this year the YPG, again with the aid of US airpower, drove ISIS out of Tal Abyad, another town on the border with Turkey. This meant ISIS had lost two of the three crossing points from Turkey through which it could bring foreign volunteers, finance, and weaponry to strengthen the jihad.

Idriss Nassan, the Kurdish spokesperson of the Kobanî canton, told me that the YPG now plans to liberate the last ISIS border-crossing point into Turkey at the town of Jarabulus. The YPG are dug in on the east bank of the Euphrates and it will be difficult to move forward. But success would be a strategic blow to ISIS, severely limiting its power. It would also upset Turkey, which fears a further strengthening of the statelet that the Kurds have set up along more than half of the Syrian–Turkish border. If the Kurds were to take control of the area from Jarabulus to Azaz, they could link the cantons of Jazira and Kobanî with Rojava’s third canton, the enclave of Afrin, which is largely populated by Kurds, creating a Kurdish zone along almost the entire length of Syria’s northern border. Since the Turks are now taking a hard line toward the Kurdish PKK within their own borders, they are anxious to prevent a strong new Kurdish entity emerging in Syria.

The Turks have said they want a no-fly zone, policed by Turkish and US warplanes, to be established in the very area from Jarabulus to Azaz that the Kurds want to take from ISIS and other jihadis. Turkish officials in Ankara claim that the no-fly scheme would block the Syrian air force and create a haven for Syrian civilians escaping Assad’s attacks. The Kurds see the scheme as a device to permit the Turks to bomb any YPG fighters who enter the area.

The US seems to have seen through Turkey’s ruse and refuses to support the no-fly zone idea. Much now depends on whether the US will back a YPG advance to Jarabulus with air strikes. Asked if the US has given the YPG a green light, Nassan, speaking for the Kobanî canton, was upbeat. “Sipan Hamo, the YPG commander, has said we’re going to liberate Jarabulus and, when he says this, he’s coordinated with the US because we’re part of its international coalition,” he said.

In mid-October, US aircraft dropped ammunition and weapons for the Kurds and their allies from local Arab and Turkmen tribes. It was a significant escalation of US military aid, and a few days later Turkey’s Prime Minister Ahmet Davutoǧlu announced that Turkey had struck the YPG twice. He was not specific but the attacks appeared to be from machine guns firing across the border. There were no reports of casualties, and the attacks seemed designed as a political message. Davutoǧlu said Turkey had told Russia and the US that YPG forces would not be permitted to proceed beyond the Euphrates. In an apparent rebuke to the Turkish prime minister, John Kerry told a Washington audience on October 28: “We’re…enhancing our air campaign in order to help drive Da’esh [ISIS], which once dominated the Syria–Turkey border, out of the last seventy-mile stretch that it controls.” Two days later, Obama announced he was ordering up to fifty US special forces into Rojava to help the YPG and allied local militias to fight ISIS.

Nassan’s office is in the western sector of Kobanî, in one of the few public buildings that remain intact. Elsewhere the streets are lined with ruins, looking like pancakes of concrete, crushed by US bombs and missiles. Civilian casualties were minimal since most people had fled as soon as ISIS appeared.

Mike King

Kobanî and the surrounding canton with its 380 villages had a pre-war population of 300,000, but by the time of the ISIS attack it had swollen to 500,000 thanks to an influx of Arabs, Armenians, Turkmen, and Kurds fleeing from other Syrian cities. Some 150,000 have already returned, according to Nassan, though it was impossible to verify his figure. The town’s bazaar is busy and the streets are full of women and children. Families are back.

The Kobanî refugees escaping ISIS included Alan Kurdi, the three-year-old toddler whose lifeless body, face-down on a Turkish beach, provoked a worldwide wave of sympathy for Syria’s refugees this summer. Few news reports mentioned that he was a Kurd and some Syrian opposition sources used his plight to claim, falsely, that his parents were taking him and his older brother to escape Assad’s barrel bombs, not ISIS.

The child’s remains, along with those of his brother and mother, are buried under gray marble slabs in Kobanî’s cemetery beside small evergreen trees planted in old tins that used to contain cooking oil. His father, Abdullah, got special permission from the Turkish authorities to bring his family’s bodies across the border, but no such allowance was given to the dozens of foreign journalists who accompanied him from Bodrum. Nor does Turkey allow international aid workers to cross into Kobanî for reconstruction and the clearing of unexploded bombs and shells. In order to circumvent this harsh embargo, they have to use the only route available for visiting the region, which goes via a flat-bottom boat or a ride on a narrow pontoon bridge across the Tigris from Iraqi Kurdistan, followed by a long day’s drive on potholed roads.

Since its withdrawal from Kobanî, ISIS has changed tactics. It uses suicide bombings and hit-and-run attacks, which are less liable to be targeted by US air strikes than large groups of fighters and armored vehicles. Shortly before dawn one night in June a group of ISIS fighters slipped into Kobanî, wearing YPG uniforms to avoid detection. They shot and killed nearly two hundred civilians before taking refuge in a city-center school. It took several days to push them out.

Syrian Kurdish militia leaders pride themselves on being not only a secular guerrilla force with no religious ideology but an army with gender equality, with women in combat on the front line. Fidan Zinar, who took command of the YPJ (Women’s Protection Units) in Kobanî a week before the ISIS raid in June, told me that she used to be a housewife in a small Syrian town. She joined the YPJ three years ago, “first of all to defend myself, then my culture, my language, my people, and our homeland.” A veteran of several clashes with ISIS, she said:

In some operations we work as a separate women’s unit, sometimes we are with male units. We can’t say we’re confident that ISIS won’t come back again. They still have agents and sleeper cells here, and there are gaps in our defenses. But they can’t make an all-out attack; [they can] only penetrate in small groups or use car bombs.

In Kobanî’s military hospital I met a young woman with her left arm in a bandage. Asmin Siterk had been wounded in a battle at the end of July to drive ISIS fighters out of Sarrin, a town on the Euphrates some fifty miles south of Kobanî. “We were in a mixed group of soldiers,” she told me. “Several men were wounded as well as me. There were six martyrs in our group, two women and four men.”

On the drive back east there was further evidence of women’s military contributions. Women in combat fatigues shared the job of examining drivers’ credentials at the numerous checkpoints. Photographs of “martyrs”—troops killed in battle—were displayed at every military post, and a good number were women. In Qamishli, Amina Ossi, the deputy minister for foreign relations in the YPG canton of Jazira, estimated the number of YPG and YPJ fighters as 50,000 and the number of martyrs in the last three years as three thousand. Half of each category were women, she said.

It was on the way to Amina’s office that I came across an initially baffling sight. A statue of Hafez al-Assad, the former Syrian president and founder of the Assad dynasty, stood unmolested at a city-center roundabout. Nearby two photographs of his son, Bashar, were on display in the front windows of Syrianair. While Kurds fly their own red, green, and yellow flag throughout the region, the Syrian national flag was hoisted above a lane of concrete blocks leading to the entrance of a small garrison.

Here is one of the complexities of the Syrian war. The regime retains control of roughly one tenth of Qamishli, plus the local airport and the connecting road as well as the Arab part of the town of Hasakah, some fifty miles to the south. This symbolic toehold allows it to claim that it still controls the capitals of all Syrian provinces except Raqqa, which is held by ISIS, and Idlib, which is held by other extreme Islamists, including Jabhat al-Nusra and Ahrar al-Sham. In return the Kurds benefit by having Damascus continuing to pay the salaries of the Kurdish region’s teachers, hospital doctors, and other public-sector workers. Civil aircraft under control of the Assad regime still fly regularly from Qamishli to Damascus and Lattakia. For students enrolled there and for businessmen this provides a useful link, since overground travel has become too dangerous.

Rojava contains some of the most fertile land in Syria, planted with wheat, cotton, and vegetables. It also has oil, although the “nodding donkeys”—the pumps that pull it out of the ground—stand idle now for lack of investment and maintenance. But most basic goods, as well as medicines in the Kurdish region’s pharmacies, are brought from Damascus on trucks that pass through ISIS territory. This is another of Syria’s complexities. ISIS leaders prefer to tax the drivers rather than block them and put the Kurdish region under siege, which could provoke more armed conflict with the Kurds.

Some activists in anti-Assad opposition groups claim that the Assad regime’s presence in Qamishli shows that the Kurds are collaborators. The point is vigorously rejected by Kurdish officials, who say they have two enemies, ISIS and Turkey, that pose a more immediate threat than Assad. ISIS fighters continue to attack them wherever they can. Turkey is a looming presence that might send its troops or aircraft across the border at any time. “War is a matter of strategy and tactics. You can’t fight on too many fronts,” Lawand Rojava, a YPG commander in Hasakah, told me.

The [Assad] regime has aircraft and uses barrel bombs. Why should we risk our people’s lives by attacking the regime’s base here, just to prove to the world that we are not allies of the regime? We have to think about the interests of the people. The regime also thinks strategically. We have had many clashes with the regime but they’re not attacking us now.

Hasakah came under assault from ISIS as recently as June. The ISIS fighters infiltrated the Arab part of town and attacked the regime’s forces. Syrian government aircraft responded, but the YPG held back. Only when ISIS moved into the Kurdish districts did the YPG call in US air strikes. Under the combined weight of YPG ground troops and US airpower ISIS was eventually pushed back but the YPG and YPJ lost fifty people, according to Lawand Rojava. He was not complimentary about the Syrian army’s performance. “There are,” he said, “various militias fighting with the [Syrian] regime. Some are Baathist. Others are from local Arab tribes. There are also the National Defense Forces”—a volunteer militia that Assad created two years ago to supplement the dwindling supply of conscripts. Using the Arabic acronym Da’esh for ISIS, he went on: “When Da’esh came into Hasakah, many regime units switched to Da’esh’s side. There are also many Da’esh spies within the regime.”

As with the ISIS counterattack after retreating from Kobanî, ISIS showed that it still has the mobility to cause casualties and terror in Hasakah. A week before my visit to the town an ISIS team in a car full of explosives blew themselves up at a checkpoint outside the front of Lawand Rojava’s headquarters, killing three soldiers. Two days earlier a suicide bomber killed twenty civilians at another checkpoint, and in a separate incident a bomber killed forty-three civilians in a crowded shopping street. Kurdish journalists in Qamishli were unaware of the atrocities, an apparent sign that the Kurdish authorities try to restrict bad news.

In Remelan, a small Syrian town close to the border of Iraq and Turkey, I went to see Saleh Muslim, the copresident of the Democratic Union Party (PYD), the largest Syrian Kurdish party, who is in effect the region’s political leader. The YPG militias are the PYD’s armed wing. As Michael Gunter describes in Out of Nowhere: The Kurds of Syria in Peace and War, the PYD began in 2003 as the Syrian branch of the PKK, the Kurdistan Workers’ Party. (Though completed before ISIS’s emergence and the start of US bombing, the book is an admirably lucid survey of the Syrian Kurds’ history and prospects.) Hafez al-Assad had given the PKK leader Abdullah Öcalan sanctuary in Syria in 1979. The move was partly to have a bargaining chip in dealings with Turkey but also, in Gunter’s words, “in return for…keeping the lid on Syria’s Kurds…. Assad allowed Syrian Kurds to join the PKK in lieu of serving in the Syrian army.”

This modus vivendi lasted until 1998 when Turkey threatened to go to war unless Syria expelled the PKK. Assad gave way and sent Öcalan and his fighters out of the country. Most of Öcalan’s guerrillas moved to northern Iraq. Öcalan himself sought refuge in various countries, eventually flying to Kenya, where he was captured in 1999 in a joint US-Turkish operation. He has been in a Turkish prison ever since.

Saleh Muslim, a native of Kobanî, was in a Syrian prison for a time as an activist after the PYD took part in anti-regime demonstrations in Qamishli in 2004. On release he made his way to a PKK camp in the Qandil mountains of Iraqi Kurdistan, and returned to Syria in April 2011 just as the new wave of anti-regime protests got underway.

The United States and the European Union designate the PKK as a terrorist group but they have been careful not to do the same with the PYD. Saleh Muslim meets regularly with US diplomats and was invited to meet Turkish officials in Istanbul in July 2013, when he assured them that the PYD was not seeking independence from Syria for Rojava.

Saleh Muslim’s soft-spoken manner and modest demeanor belie the steel and determination that have helped him turn the PYD into an unexpectedly powerful political and military force. While supporting Assad’s replacement by a national unity government, he has no doubt that the immediate threat comes from ISIS, and that foreign governments need to give priority to ISIS in defining their objectives in Syria. Asked if the Assad regime was close to being toppled by ISIS, he told me: “If it collapses because of the Salafis [i.e., ISIS], it would be a disaster for everyone. If it collapses by agreement with other forces, it would be all right.”

He argued that there should be talks between the regime and the non-Islamist forces such as the Kurds with the aim of reaching a political deal, since neither side could eliminate the other, but there was no prospect of negotiating with ISIS, since they did not believe in compromise. “For Da’esh and people with their mentality you cannot think of any way of ending them except via military force…. We wouldn’t feel safe in our homes as long as there is one Da’esh person left alive. They are an enemy of humanity.”

Muslim was speaking to me when the Russian military build-up in Lattakia was underway but before the Russian air strikes started and Assad met with Vladimir Putin in Moscow. Saleh Muslim has regular contacts with Russian diplomats, as he has with Americans, and said he had been assured by senior Russian officials on a visit to Moscow in September that Russia would not bring ground troops to fight in Syria. “We and our allies among the Arabs have said many times we don’t agree to have foreign armies in Syria, or any invasion by any side. If the Russians break through on this, it means a kind of invasion and our people won’t agree to it.”

He favored coordination between the US and Russian air forces. As long as it was not designed exclusively to support the Assad regime, he saw no reason why the US should not coordinate with the Syrian army and provide air cover if it launched ground offensives against ISIS since defeating ISIS, in his view, took priority over replacing Assad’s regime.

He foresaw the day when the Syrian Kurdish militias could close the last ISIS crossing point from Turkey at Jarabulus. The YPG could then even move on ISIS’s capital in Raqqa “with the help of others.”

The PYD’s relationship with the other main Kurdish parties in the region is complicated. It denies having organic links to the PKK in Turkey, though it reveres the PKK’s imprisoned leader, Abdullah Öcalan. His picture is prominently displayed in public offices and at military checkpoints, even sometimes on badges on soldiers’ shoulders, and he is referred to as “Apo” (Uncle).

The PYD’s links to the ruling parties in Iraqi Kurdistan are polite but cool, partly for ideological reasons since the PYD is left-wing and the Iraqi parties are center-right but mainly because the PYD insists on monopolizing decision-making in their own region. A recent meeting between Saleh Muslim and the Iraqi Kurdish president, Masoud Barzani, which was organized and attended by Brett McGurk, the US special envoy to the anti-ISIS coalition, was aimed at getting Muslim to agree that a few thousand US-trained peshmerga in Iraq who owe loyalty to smaller Syrian Kurdish parties would be allowed to cross from Iraq and join the struggle. Muslim insisted that they come under YPG command and the meeting failed.

The PYD is facing criticism from some supporters. There is war weariness and anxiety over the long periods of military service for young men and women. I found people grumbling over a new decree that puts under government control properties left empty by those who have fled abroad. Officials insist that this is not expropriation but a measure designed to assess the scale of vacant buildings and rehouse people who have abandoned vulnerable villages for the safety of the main towns. If the owners return, they will get their houses back.

In his book, Gunter points out that the Assads maintained an artificial Arab Belt (al-Hizam al-Arabi) along the Turkish border by settling Arabs in new villages there with the aim of separating Syria’s Kurds from the Kurds of southern Turkey. Arab and Turkmen refugees, now in Turkey, have recently claimed that the Pyd is engaging in ethnic cleansing, forced deportation, and demolition of houses. Some of these charges have been taken up by Amnesty International. PYD officials deny that they are destroying the Arab Belt. They say that some villages had to be abandoned for security reasons because their inhabitants sympathized with ISIS fighters when they infiltrated it; when ISIS left, the Arabs and Turkmen voluntarily fled for fear of being suspected by the Kurds of having helped ISIS and harboring “sleeper cells.”

What is Rojava’s future? Militarily, it seems relatively secure. ISIS has suffered much at the YPG’s hands over the last year and is unlikely to want to repeat the experience of confronting them, although ISIS will fight to retain Jarabulus, its last crossing point to Turkey. Besides, ISIS’s long-term ambition is not focused on the Kurds but on Arab regions, whether in Syria, Iraq, or beyond those two countries, in Jordan and Saudi Arabia.

Turkey is the joker in the deck. The peace talks between Turkey and the PKK broke down this summer and Turkey resumed its air strikes on PKK bases. I asked Saleh Muslim if he was afraid of a Turkish military intervention at some point. After all, Rojava is a long and thin slice of land on Turkey’s borders that is only lightly defended by 50,000 Kurdish militia troops. “Two years ago I was most afraid of a Turkish intervention, but Turkey is not so free to do that now,” he replied, apparently confident that Washington’s alliance with the YPG in the struggle against ISIS has limited Turkey’s options.

Like most Kurds in Rojava—and I heard the same from Iraqi Kurdish officials in Erbil—Saleh Muslim believes that Turkey’s president Recep Tayyip Erdoǧan’s recent attacks on the PKK were designed to win Turkish nationalist support for his party in the parliamentary elections on November 1. If that was Erdoǧan’s strategy, it worked handsomely. The opposition Nationalist Action Party (MHP) lost forty of its eighty seats and Erdoǧan’s Justice and Development Party (AKP) surged to an outright majority in parliament after a campaign in which it insisted that it alone could give Turkey stability and security. The question now is whether Erdoǧan continues his attacks on the PKK and, by extension, the Syrian Kurds, or resumes the peace process with the PKK.

Whatever Erdoǧan decides, there appears to be no chance that Rojava will ever go back under Arab control as fully as it was before 2011. Before the Geneva talks in 2014, the last occasion when the UN brokered negotiations between the Syrian government and its opponents, the Syrian Kurds insisted on coming as a separate delegation and refused to join the opposition coalition when they were told they had to join with others. After almost five years of war Syria is fragmented, and it is unclear whether Damascus will ever be restored as a powerful seat of central government. The best that can be expected is a devolved federal system, either by a formal constitutional change or merely de facto.

Rule from Damascus may be replaced by competing rulers or warlords in different cities. Whoever they are, whether Islamist or secular, no set of Arab rulers will easily be accepted again by Syria’s Kurds. Their language is being revived. They run their own education system and have an authentic local media. They have tasted the benefits of autonomy and will resist any attempt to have all this extinguished.

—November 4, 2015

Four Socialist Takes on Bernie Sanders’ Democratic Socialism Speech

democracy, working classFour Takes on Bernie Sanders’ Democratic Socialism Speech
Date of Source: Saturday, November 21, 2015

Kshama Sawant on Bernie Sanders’ Democratic Socialism [1]

Sanders spoke today, November 19, at Georgetown University about democratic socialism. Kshama Sawant, Seattle’s Socialist Alternative City Councilmember, responds to his message in this video (see transcript below).

Continue reading

John Cusack + Arundhati Roy – Conversations with each other and Snowdon and Ellsberg

Things That Can and Cannot Be Said: A Conversation Between John Cusack and Arundhati Roy
Monday, 16 November 2015 00:00
By John Cusack and Arundhati Roy, Outlook | Op-Ed – go to for original

Every nation-state tends towards the imperial – that is the point. Through banks, armies, secret police, propaganda, courts and jails, treaties, taxes, laws and orders, myths of civil obedience, assumptions of civic virtue at the top. Still it should be said of the political left, we expect something better. And correctly. We put more trust in those who show a measure of compassion, who denounce the hideous social arrangements that make war inevitable and human desire omnipresent; which fosters corporate selfishness, panders to appetites and disorder, waste the earth.”—Daniel Berrigan, poet, Jesuit priest.


John Cusack: One morning as I scanned the news – horror in the Middle East, Russia and America facing off in the Ukraine, I thought of Edward Snowden and wondered how he was holding up in Moscow. I began to imagine a conversation between him and Daniel Ellsberg (who leaked the Pentagon Papers during the Vietnam war). And then, interestingly, in my imagination a third person made her way into the room – the writer Arundhati Roy. It occurred to me that trying to get the three of them together would be a fine thing to do.

Continue reading


by Victor Grossman – Berlin Bulletin No. 102, November 3 2015
How the world changes! Last spring many Europeans, especially Greeks, were so angry at a tight-fisted, cruel Angela Merkel and her acceptance of people’s sufferings that they scribbled Hitler mustaches on her public portraits. Only weeks later she was celebrated around the continent, indeed the world, as a symbol of generosity and humanity. Which judgement is correct, that until July or that since late August? Is she a Frau Scrooge – or a reincarnated Mother Teresa?
What defies any clear appraisal is the on-going wavering of her government, her party and herself! The German political scene is in turmoil, with echoes all over Europe! Such turbulence has on occasion opened the way to healthy change. Now, in my view, it can lead to great dangers.

Continue reading